Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 77

Thread: Marvel lays out Phase 5

  1. #41
    Elder Arcanist

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,324

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Spoiler for spoiler:
    Kang with the temporal loom and the TVA made it so the only timeline was the one where he lived. This also kept other Kangs away. Once he died the timeline started branching and the TVA broke down.

    Loki became a time god figuring all that shit out. Instead of killing Sylvie to save Kang and continue with one timeline, Loki destroyed the temporal loom, allowing for timeline branches.

    Loki grabbed the temporal branches and created Yggdrasil, which is a somewhat important Norse plant. This created a new and better temporal loom, without the need for TVA pruning.

    Basically Kang got cheeky and let Sylvie kill him thinking Loki would fix everything for him after his death. Kang fucked around and found out.

  2. #42
    Ellsworth M. Toohey
    PPatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    34,032

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Spoiler for I already got the...:
    ...Yggdrasil part -- the tree shape made it immediately obvious. But I don't understand how Loki solved the scaling problem of infinite branches. If there are an infinite number of them, it is by definition impossible to grab them all.

    Also, how did Loki have the ability to do all this? It feels very deus ex machina.

  3. #43
    Elder Arcanist

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,324

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Spoiler for ...:
    Loki was the center of the tree with all branches coming off of him and his power was organizing it, instead of trying to contain it all in rings. In made up physics that makes it more better!

    As for the deus ex machina part, welcome to comic books. Loki was doing time jumping stuff for who knows how long? Maybe hundreds of thousands of years or more? By the end Kang was talking to him more like an equal. He also had godlike powers before he got to the show.

  4. #44
    Rainbow Carrot Loves You
    Yeah!
    Wool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    17,110

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    I'm pretty happy with that as a finale.


    Spoiler for spoiler:


    Loki didn't solve the scaling problem, because it was only a problem from a certain point of view. The loom's implosion was part of the design, as its primary purpose was to preserve the "sacred timeline", not reality itself. Both the loom and the sacred timeline were about control and being limited was part of the point.

    Loki isn't controlling the branches as much as he is holding them together. I'm not even sure I would count the tree as a temporal loom. I think the idea was that he was giving life to that which was dead and letting those that were left behind deal with the consequences. There is nothing to scale for anymore because the branches are free to grow on their own.


    I couldn't tell you how his magic lets him do this. Beyond just his experience gained from the Groundhog Day act, it's possible his exposure to time radiation this season changed him in some way. A single scene in which OB explained there was something strange about Loki's temporal aura might have been enough.

    I thought the arc itself is fine. But it is rushed as a consequence of telling this story in a short run TV show. Even the final episode had a lot of potential growth you are left to assume happened off screen, first as a joke and then later as a twist when it's shown he has mastered both the knowledge of and the manipulation of time.




    I also find myself appreciating the effort they went through in maintaining thematic elements throughout the entire season.

    Spoiler for spoiler:

    There's the obvious stuff about time being cyclical, the beginning of the story also being the end, ouroboros, etc.

    I thought Loki basically became the God of Time, but apparently in the comics he gained a new moniker as the "God of Stories". This feels appropriate as in the very final scene we witness Loki being aware of and watching his friends' lives (their stories) but not contributing to them anymore. In retrospect, this also makes the scene in which OB is talking about fiction versus science make more (thematic) sense.



  5. #45
    Mangina at large.
    Delores Mulva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,487

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    The Marvels is pretty good, but it is decidedly feminine in how it approaches things if that's something that would bother you. And boy does it ever set up the future of the MCU....

  6. #46
    Ancient Arcanist
    Ackar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    15,457

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Still sucks that some people had to sit through a shitty movie just for the post-credit scene payoff.

    I just watched the scenes on youtube and skipped the unrelated throwaway parts.

  7. #47
    Ellsworth M. Toohey
    PPatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    34,032

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Quote Originally Posted by Delores Mulva View Post
    The Marvels is pretty good, but it is decidedly feminine in how it approaches things if that's something that would bother you.
    Welp, I guess I'll have to skip it then, I don't want to get the cooties...

  8. #48
    Rainbow Carrot Loves You
    Yeah!
    Wool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    17,110

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Give me all the cooties. In three months, when its on Disney+.

    Maybe sooner if it flops hard enough! Go internet hate squad go!

  9. #49
    Mangina at large.
    Delores Mulva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,487

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Quote Originally Posted by Ackar
    Still sucks that some people had to sit through a shitty movie just for the post-credit scene payoff.
    It wasn't shitty. I enjoyed it a lot. But it was "girly", for lack of a better way of describing it. I can see that bothering some people. (Examples of "girly": plot points involving a musical, many cats, scenes where people process emotions, and a joke about writing fan fiction.)

  10. #50
    Elder Arcanist

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,324

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Its interesting. My sister and a lot of the women I know loved the first Captain Marvel movie and talked about it a decent bit when it first came out. Now there wasn't a peep about this movie from any of them. I was reading that the ones who saw this one was trending 60%+ men. I guess they completely failed this time while something like Barbie was a huge success with the women demographic.

  11. #51
    Ancient Arcanist
    Ackar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    15,457

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Marvel Studios Taking Stock of Strategy Amid ‘The Marvels' Meltdown -- The Hollywood Reporter

    The anything-but-marvelous performance of The Marvels is a moment of reckoning for Marvel Studios, the production house that has been the superhero of the box office for much of the past 15 years, since Iron Man burst onto the scene in 2008.

    Over the Nov. 10-12 weekend, The Marvels debuted to $46.1 million in North America, the worst opening in the history of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which has raked in more than $30 billion in global movie ticket sales. The 33rd MCU installment was battered by withering audience exit scores and a ho-hum B CinemaScore.

    But it wasn't the first warning sign that something was amiss within Marvel in terms of quality control as Feige's team went into overdrive producing shows for streaming; features Eternals and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantamania were also slapped with B CinemaScores, while audiences began complaining about keeping up with an increasing number of shows on Disney+ to understand the overarching MCU story.

    Behind the scenes, Marvel Studios and Disney were well aware The Marvels was in trouble before it hit the big screen. There was also a recognition that Feige and his team needed time to take stock of their theatrical tentpoles, sources tell The Hollywood Reporter. On Nov. 8, Bob Iger said during on an earnings call that Disney's movie empire has "lost focus" because of an emphasis on quantity over quality in the rush to feed Disney+ under the Bob Chapek regime (though it was Iger himself who initiated this push before Chapek's reign). Feige and his team felt this mandate keenly, to detriment of Marvel's movies, sources say.

    A day later, Marvel and Disney revealed they were scaling back the number of superhero films they will release in 2024 from three to one. That news was made at the end of the SAG-AFTRA strike, and while the work stoppage, which shut down production on Deadpool 3, is certainly part of the reason for some of the date changes, it wasn't the only one, sources say.

    Shawn Levy and Ryan Reynolds' Deadpool 3 will be Marvel and Disney's sole superhero offering in 2024, and will now open on July 26 instead of May 3. The high-profile threequel, which co-stars Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, is the first Deadpool to be released by Disney since it acquired 20th Century Fox and is also the first R-rated pic to be released by Marvel Studios. The marquee title is described as a multiverse-spanning feature that will set the stage for Marvel's upcoming Avengers movies.

    Marvel Studios' Captain America: New World Order, which was previously set to hit theaters July 26, 2024, has been delayed nine months to Feb. 14, 2025, which will give the studio time to shoot additional material. Marvel's antihero-centric movie Thunderbolts, starring Florence Pugh and Sebastian Stan, is moving from Dec. 20, 2024, to July 25, 2025.

    Among 2025 titles, Blade, starring Mahershala Ali, has been pushed back nine months, moving its release date from Feb. 14, 2025, to Nov. 7, 2025. Both Blade and Thunderbolts were scheduled to go into production this past summer but did not have scripts that were ready in time, so they were shut down amid the writers strike in May. The release-date changes announced Nov. 9 mean that Marvel has four superhero pics set for 2025 when including the Fantastic Four reboot, scheduled for release on May 2 (like Deadpool, Fantastic Four arrived from 20th Century), but that could change.

    Rather than being a straight up sequel to the billion-dollar blockbuster Captain Marvel, The Marvels is something of a mashup. In the movie, Larson is joined by Iman Vellani, the breakout star of the Disney+ series Ms. Marvel, as well as WandaVision‘s Teyonah Parris as the grown-up version of Captain Marvel character Monica Rambeau. Mixing and matching characters for sequels is a game plan Marvel has used in the past on films like Captain America: Civil War, which featured nearly every Marvel character imaginable, but to much different results, grossing $1.15 billion in 2016.

    "Why not simply make Captain Marvel 2? Why produce The Marvels when your audience identified, empathized, and even hero-identified with Brie Larson's character? More importantly, why offer people similar or the same characters and stories that are on Disney+ if you expect them to go to a theater together? Disney/Marvel diluted their product," says one film producer. "Of course, a picture works or fails for other reasons too, but losing so much value picture-over-picture is rare and hard to do."

    Captain Marvel debuted to $153.4 million in North America on its way to earning a massive $1.13 billion worldwide, not adjusted for inflation. To be sure, that movie had a clear advantage in that it was teased in the post-credit scene of 2018's Avengers: Infinity War, while its titular star was a player in 2019's Avengers: Endgame (it was released between the two Marvel mega-blockbusters).

    Until now, rival DC was the superhero studio that endured the biggest ups and downs, with a good number of its films opening to $50 million or less (in comparison, many MCU releases started with $100 million or more domestically). This summer, DC's The Flash debuted to a dismal $55 million domestically on its way to topping out at a paltry $270.6 million globally.

    Notes Comscore box office analyst Paul Dergarabedian, "the uneven performance of all superhero films in recent years should be a wake-up call in terms of how these films are conceived, executed and marketed moving forward."

  12. #52
    Ancient Arcanist
    Ackar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    15,457

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Marvel Studios’ What If…? Season 2 | Official Trailer | Disney+


  13. #53
    Ellsworth M. Toohey
    PPatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    34,032

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Quote Originally Posted by PPatty View Post
    This is the right decision, because brand fatigue and genre fatigue are real:

    Disney cuts back on Marvel, Star Wars content (cnbc.com)
    The unspoken subtext is that Kevin Feige has spread himself too thin:

    Disney CEO Bob Iger says ‘No. 1 priority’ is turning around Marvel, acknowledges ‘too many sequels’ after box office misses


  14. #54
    Ancient Arcanist
    Ackar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    15,457

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    The actress that played X-23 in Logan will show up in Deadpool 3 as an older X-23, along with many other continuity crossovers.

    Deadpool 3: Wolverine X-23 Returns Breakdown and Teaser Easter Eggs



    They're also introducing new X-men variants to introduce the rebooted younger X-men of the future movies.

  15. #55
    Ancient Arcanist
    Ackar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    15,457

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Marvel Studios’ WHAT IF…? Season 2 — FINAL TRAILER | Disney+


  16. #56
    Ancient Arcanist
    Ackar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    15,457

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Marvel won’t move forward with Jonathan Majors after he’s found guilty of assault

    A New York jury on Monday found actor Jonathan Majors guilty of assault and harassment of his former girlfriend during a domestic dispute.

    Majors, a rising star who has appeared in Disney’s Marvel franchise and “Creed III,” was convicted on Monday of one count of reckless assault in the 3rd degree and a non-criminal charge of harassment as a violation.

    He was acquitted on another assault charge and one count of aggravated harassment.

    Majors, who was present in court on Monday, held a straight a face while the verdict was being read. He left the courthouse without commenting to members of the media.

    In a statement to CNN on Monday afternoon, Priya Chaudhry, an attorney for Majors, said he “still has faith in the process and looks forward to fully clearing his name.”

    Shortly after news of the verdict, a source with knowledge of the matter told CNN that Marvel Studios would not be moving forward on any future projects with Majors, who was set to star as the villainous Kang in the upcoming “Avengers: The Kang Dynasty.”

    A representative for Marvel declined to comment when reached by CNN.

    The jury in the case deliberated for about four and a half hours total before reaching a verdict.

    The trial, which began on December 4, stems from a March domestic dispute involving Majors and his former girlfriend, Grace Jabbari. Majors had pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor charges of assault and aggravated harassment.

    During closing arguments last week, prosecutors alleged Majors “didn’t hesitate to use physical violence” against Jabbari when he grabbed Jabbari’s right hand, twisted her arm behind her back and then “struck a blow” to her head.

    Majors’ attorney reiterated his innocence during her closing argument, calling the accusations against him “fake” and alleging that Jabbari was the aggressor in their argument.

    Majors did not testify during the trial, but he was present in the New York City courtroom for the duration of the proceedings.

    According to the New York Times, Jabbari testified on December 5 that Majors assaulted her in the backseat of a car during the March dispute, which prosecutors said happened after Jabbari saw a romantic text message on his phone from someone else.

    “We are gratified to see justice served by today’s guilty verdict. Ms. Jabbari testified publicly and truthfully, even though reliving these traumatic events on the witness stand was obviously painful,” Jabbari’s attorneys said in a statement to CNN on Monday. “We are grateful to the jurors and the Judge for their attention and patience, and to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office for their hard work and support.”

    Until his legal troubles, Majors had starred in a number of high-profile film roles with more slated for production. He appeared as Kang in the Marvel film, “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania,” which released back in February. He also appeared in the Disney+ series “Loki,” which aired its second season in October.

    “Avengers: The Kang Dynasty” was to release in 2026 and would have served as a starring vehicle for Majors. He was also set to star in another film centered around his Marvel character, “Avengers: Secret Wars,” slated for a 2027 debut.

    With Majors’ career trajectory already paused due to the trial, his professional future is now in question. The actor could face up to a year in prison for the assault conviction. He also faces a maximum of 15 days in jail and a $250 fine for the harassment violation.

    His sentencing is scheduled for February 6 next year.

  17. #57
    Mangina at large.
    Delores Mulva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,487

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Looks like it's variant time.

  18. #58
    Elder Arcanist

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,324

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    They should just shitcan Kang and move on to a better villain. Loki pretty much solved the problem and having freaking antman defeat the new big bad was so damned stupid.
    Last edited by Philo; December 18th, 2023 at 09:30 PM.

  19. #59
    Ellsworth M. Toohey
    PPatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    34,032

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    It's official — meet the next Fantastic Four (refresh if you don't see tweet):



    https://twitter.com/MarvelStudios/st...96892455694452

  20. #60
    Ellsworth M. Toohey
    PPatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    34,032

    Re: Marvel lays out Phase 5

    Quote Originally Posted by Delores Mulva View Post
    The Marvels is pretty good, but it is decidedly feminine in how it approaches things if that's something that would bother you. And boy does it ever set up the future of the MCU....
    Watched it tonight on streaming. I greatly enjoyed it … and it should not have been a theatrical release. Again, it didn't feel like a feature film so much as an episode of MCU: The Neverending Series.

    I love Ms. Marvel and the family dynamic she brings from the streaming series, and Kamala seemed to have decent chemistry with the other two — I got a big kick out of their training montage and relished the sequence on the musical planet all the way until the Kree baddie arrives. The Flerken remain hilarious, and their use as escape pods amused me.

    But as much as I got personally dug the experience, much of the time I was thinking in the back of my mind that there's no way this would ever have widespread appeal. You've got three characters with little to no cachet, the fact that it's three females will automatically turn off a certain male segment of the fanbase. Even worse, two of them, Carol and Monica, still have all the personality of a tree, and they're dumped into a sloppy piece of storytelling to boot.

    Epilogue and mid-credits scenes were cute. Get ready for the mutants.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •